USPTO serial 85860977
PORTICO SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PORTICO SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hal Parkerson
HAL PARKERSON HAL PARKERESON1 GLENLAKE PKWY NE STE 700ATLANTA, GA 30328-3496UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Anti-breakage floor mats made primarily of Rubber, textiles and plastic.; Anti-fatigue floor mat; Anti-fatigue floor mats made primarily of Rubber, textiles and plastic.; Anti-slip floor mats made primarily of Rubber, textiles and plastic.; Anti-static floor mats made primarily of Rubber, textiles and plastic.; Carpet tiles; Carpet tiles for covering floors; Carpet tiles made of textiles; Carpeting; Carpets; Carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum for covering existing floors; Coverings for existing floors; Door mats; Door mats of textile; Floor coverings; Floor coverings made of Rubber, textiles and plastic.; Floor coverings of rubber and synthetic rubber; Floor mat systems comprised primarily of floor mats made of Rubber, textiles and plastic.; Floor mats; Floor mats featuring logos made primarily of Rubber, textiles and plastic.; Floor mats made of Rubber, textiles and plastic.; Floor mats used in industrial applications made primarily of Rubber, textiles and plastic.; Gymnasium floor coverings; Linoleum; Linoleum for use on floors; Rubber mats; Vinyl floor coverings; Vinyl floor mats for indoor use | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2004 |
| 037 | Application of coatings and sealers; Application of epoxy coatings to floors; Application of protective coatings; Application of slip-resistant safety floor coatings and sealers; Application of slip-resistant safety floor sealers; Applying protective coatings to concrete, metal,plastic and rubber; Carpet and rug cleaning; Carpet cleaning; Custom painting of designs or text on clothing and bags; Floor treatment services, namely, application of chemical preparations to floors to make them slip-resistant for safety purposes; Installing carpet; Installing floor tile; Laying of carpet; Rug cleaning; Tile installation services | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |