Drawing for SQLYZER

USPTO serial 85862190

SQLYZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SQLYZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven A. Swernofsky

STEVEN A. SWERNOFSKY DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP305 LYTTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1431UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for use in application performance management; software for monitoring, analyzing, reporting, and solving performance issuesACTIVE
042Services related to application performance management, namely, computer monitoring service which tracks application software performance, performs periodic maintenance and provides reports and alerts concerning such performance; Services related to monitoring, analyzing, reporting, and solving performance issues, namely, computer monitoring service which tracks application software performance, performs periodic maintenance and provides reports and alerts concerning such performance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in application performance management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in monitoring, analyzing, reporting, and solving performance issues; Providing non-downloadable online software for use in application performance management; Providing non-downloadable online software for monitoring, analyzing, reporting, and solving application software performance issues; Remote services related to application performance management, namely, monitoring of computer application software by remote access to ensure proper functioning; Remote services related to monitoring, analyzing, reporting, and solving performance issues, namely, remote computer monitoring service which tracks application software performance, performs periodic maintenance and provides reports and alerts concerning such performanceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 6, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 28, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 12, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 12, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 12, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 11, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 7, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 2, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance