USPTO serial 85862951
LYTNING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LYTNING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Chen
DAVID CHEN IP ATTORNEYS GROUP LLC16 OXFORD RDFL 2MILFORD, CT 06460-3823Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective industrial boots, protective industrial shoes, shoes and boots for protection against accident | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |