USPTO serial 85863552
DISCOVERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DISCOVERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin D. Elder
KEVIN D ELDER SINSHEIMER JUHNKE MCIVOR & STROH LLPP O BOX 31SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | LED lighting fixtures and mounting hardware for lighting purposes, namely, LED lights for automobiles, motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles and marine vessels | ABANDONED | Nov 15, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |