Drawing for DESIGNLIFE

USPTO serial 85863618

DESIGNLIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESIGNLIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Fraser

JENNIFER FRASER Dykema Gossett PLLC1301 K Street N.W.Suite 1100 WestWashington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Bathtub rails adapted for physically disabled persons; Canes for medical purposes; Health monitors comprising sensor that monitor the health of the elderly or disabled in their own homes; Invalid walkers; Medical apparatus, namely, an extremity garment donning assist device for use by physically disabled persons; Medical apparatus, namely, ladder-type device to assist physically disabled individuals in transferring from one position to another; Multiple-pocketed carrier for personal items specially adapted for attachment to orthopedic walkers; Orthopedic walkers; Toilets adapted for medical patients or for use by disabled persons; Walkers for use by mobility-impaired individuals; Walkers to aid in mobility; Walking aids; Walking aids for disabled persons, namely, walking framesACTIVE
035Retail building supply store services featuring safety products for kitchens and bathroomsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jan 3, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jan 3, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 2, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 2, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 2, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 2, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 2, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 27, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 27, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 27, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 9, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 4, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 19, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 19, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 7, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 8, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Mar 7, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 4, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance