Drawing for INTERSECT CONNECT

USPTO serial 85863637

INTERSECT CONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERSECT CONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. Burlingame

ROBERT B. BURLINGAME PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPPO BOX 2824SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94126-2824UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data analytics software that unifies data from almost any source to enable users to monitor and analyze multi-source streams of data and to produce data analytics reports based thereonACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 24, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 24, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 24, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 24, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 24, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 25, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 25, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 25, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 30, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 19, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 1, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 27, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 26, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 21, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 21, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 21, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 24, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 23, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 7, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 4, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance