Drawing for GYGAX

USPTO serial 85866564

GYGAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GYGAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Brown

Jeffrey H. Brown Michael Best & Friedrich LLP180 N STETSON AVE STE 2000Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009motion pictures about role-playing games and the development of role-playing games; motion pictures about a game designer; motion pictures in the nature of fantasy; computer game softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 4, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 23, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 23, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 25, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 19, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2014ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 26, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 14, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2013GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2013GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2013EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jun 21, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance