USPTO serial 85866676
SKYLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2017
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SKYLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP
Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP
Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micol Cecchi
Micol Cecchi Nissan North America, Inc.P.O. Box 685001Legal Dept. Mail Stop A-5-CFranklin, TN 37068-5001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software in the field of automotive racing | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys and playthings, namely, ride-on toy vehicles [; light plush toys; stand-alone video output game machines and arcade games; arcade-type electronic video games and coin operated video games] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SKYLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |