CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RENEW ORTHOPEDICS

USPTO serial 85867159

RENEW ORTHOPEDICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RENEW ORTHOPEDICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gordon T. Foote, II

GORDON T. FOOTE, II HALLETT & PERRIN, P.C.1445 ROSS AVE STE 2400DALLAS, TX 75202-2758UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgeryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 14, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 24, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 23, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 23, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 23, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 4, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 16, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 14, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 30, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 30, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance