USPTO serial 85867640
CIRRACHECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CIRRACHECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Gregory, Jr.
RICHARD L. GREGORY, JR. IPR LAW GROUP PC5338 CORNISH STHOUSTON, TX 77007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Compiling, maintaining and managing of computerized databases for healthcare providers, namely, databases featuring patient financial information about delinquent patient indebtedness to healthcare providers for services rendered; none of the foregoing being in relation to credit cards, debit cards, payment cards, automatic teller machines (ATMs), point of sale payment terminals, ATM, financial, banking, credit and payments services, electronic funds and currency transfer services, computer hardware and software for carrying out the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing healthcare providers access to a database of patient financial data, namely, data of delinquent patient indebtedness to healthcare providers for services rendered; none of the foregoing being in relation to credit cards, debit cards, payment cards, automatic teller machines (ATMs), point of sale payment terminals, ATM, financial, banking, credit and payments services, electronic funds and currency transfer services, computer hardware and software for carrying out the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 14, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |