USPTO serial 85868227
SUPER-SOOTHING WHITE NOISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER-SOOTHING WHITE NOISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shannon L. Van Dorn,
SHANNON L. VAN DORN, ESQ.3500 W OLIVE AVE STE 300BURBANK, CA 91505-4647UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded laser discs, audio cassettes, CD-ROMs, CDs, electronic media, and digital media, namely, downloadable audio recordings, all featuring information and audio recordings of music and self-improvement for the purpose of calming crying babies and toddlers while they are awake, and to assist babies and toddlers in going to sleep | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Happiest Baby, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Happiest Baby, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HB Innovations Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SUPER-SOOTHING WHITE NOISE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2016 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 27, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |