Drawing for BIG WIN VIDEO POKER

USPTO serial 85868524

BIG WIN VIDEO POKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIG WIN VIDEO POKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arturo Perez-Guerrero

Arturo Perez-Guerrero MARCAS ESTADOS UNIDOSP.O. Box 9024163San Juan, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; computer software for wireless content delivery; electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; electronic game software for wireless devicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 5, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 1, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 29, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Sep 29, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Sep 29, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Mar 15, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 9, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 2, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 31, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 20, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 7, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 30, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 30, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 25, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 22, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 20, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 29, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 28, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 20, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 14, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 5, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 24, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 12, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 29, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 29, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 29, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 30, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 11, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 9, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance