USPTO serial 85869361
ETEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ETEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley P. Hartman
BRADLEY P. HARTMAN HARTMAN TITUS PLC7114 E STETSON DR STE 205SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251-3250UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Analyzing, evaluating, and reporting energy demands for electric vehicles and suggested infrastructure modifications relating thereto; Battery research, development and life-cycle testing and consulting services; Business development and business planning consulting services for communities, namely, assisting government organizations, utilities, private-sector businesses, and automotive manufacturers in the planning for the deployment of electric transportation charging infrastructure; Analyzing, evaluating, reporting and making recommendations regarding the placement of electric vehicle charging infrastructure within a geographic region; Testing, inspection, analysis and evaluation of battery life-cycles, capacity, power capabilities, and drive cycles ; Compiling data for research purposes in the fields of vehicle driving habits, vehicle usage and electric vehicle charging; Consulting services for others in the field of building code review relating to the placement and installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure; Consulting services for others in the field of designing, building, planning, installing and servicing electric vehicle chargers and charging infrastructure; Analyzing, evaluating, and reporting electric vehicle power demands; Consulting services for others in the fields of electricity consumption, power demand, and battery electric, hybrid electric, plug-in hybrid electric, low-speed, special-purpose, and industrial electric vehicles; Development and deployment of residential, commercial, and municipal electric vehicle charging station infrastructure; Development of battery technologies for vehicles; Electronic data collection and data analysis and reporting services for business purposes in the fields of vehicles and vehicle battery technology; Installation and maintenance of electrical vehicle supply systems and equipment and computer hardware and software; Print and electronic publications in the fields of electric vehicles, electric vehicle chargers, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, battery technologies, vehicle driving habits, vehicle usage and electric vehicle charging; Product research and development in the field of residential, commercial, and municipal electric vehicle charging infrastructure; Project management and consulting services in the fields of electric vehicles operations, electric vehicle chargers, electric vehicle batteries, energy and alternative fuel, power plant siting and operation, and renewable energy; Research and analysis in the fields of public policy and federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations concerning electricity, utility grid infrastructure, energy pricing, electric vehicles, electric vehicle charging and electric vehicle supply equipment; Research and development and technological consultation in the fields of battery chargers, electric vehicle charging systems, DC fast chargers, electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE), fast-charge systems for electric vehicles, material handling and airport ground support applications, plug-in hybrid vehicles, advanced battery systems, and hydrogen internal combustion engine conversions; Research and development in the fields of electricity consumption, power demand, and battery electric, hybrid electric, plug-in hybrid electric, low-speed, special-purpose, and industrial electric vehicles; Technological consultation in the technology field of battery electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, low-speed vehicles, special-purpose vehicles, industrial electric vehicles, and medium-duty trucks; Technological consultation in the technology field of electric vehicles, batteries, electric vehicle supply equipment, electric vehicle chargers, and hydrogen fueling of vehicles; Testing, inspection, analysis and evaluation of batteries; Testing, inspection, analysis, and evaluation of vehicles; Testing, inspection, analysis, and evaluation of vehicle driving habits; Vehicle battery range estimation and validation research, evaluation and reporting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |