USPTO serial 85869444
MAGNUM CREAM LIQUEUR HIGHLAND CREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGNUM CREAM LIQUEUR HIGHLAND CREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis S. Prahl
DENNIS S. PRAHL LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018-3703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | cream liqueur | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |