Drawing for DYNAVOX

USPTO serial 85869851

DYNAVOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNAVOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Bagarazzi

JAMES M. BAGARAZZI DORITY & MANNING, P.A.PO BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer based device with changeable display of multiple icons selectable by a speech impaired user to generate voice output to assist in communication and software that is downloadable onto a computer based device to enable such device to operate changeable display of multiple icons selectable by a speech impaired user to generate voice output to assist in communication; symbol-adapted special education software used to assist individuals in overcoming their speech, language and learning challenges; software that assists in providing therapy for aphasia; software that assists in providing therapy for ALS; software that assists in providing therapy for autismACTIVE—
016Printed manuals and test forms for assessing communication ability of persons having speech, language or learning challengesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 21, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 12, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2013AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2013PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance