Drawing for SOLAR NUCLEAR FUSION DEVELOPMENT

USPTO serial 85870110

SOLAR NUCLEAR FUSION DEVELOPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLAR NUCLEAR FUSION DEVELOPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher L. Curfman

LISA C PAVENTO MEUNIER CARLIN & CURFMAN LLC817 W PEACHTREE ST NWSTE 500ATLANTA, GA 30308-1188

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Designing plant components and equipment for nuclear power plantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 13, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 13, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 3, 2015EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 21, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2015GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 29, 2015GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 29, 2015CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 11, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 11, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 9, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance