Drawing for W WILLIAMSRDM

USPTO serial 85871204

W WILLIAMSRDM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with W WILLIAMSRDM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl P. Leb

CHERYL P. LEB KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP201 MAIN ST STE 2500FORT WORTH, TX 76102-3129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic testing apparatus for weapons systems, electrical adapters, and connectors for electrical circuits and switches; fire extinguishers and alarms; electronic monitoring devices using radio frequency for manufacturing, industrial and power grid equipment monitoringACTIVE—
042research and development in the fields of weapons testing, wire and connectivity testing, and manufacturing, industrial and power grid equipment diagnostics; design and inspection of fire suppression systems; research, development and testing of ship automation and ship equipment controlsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 25, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 22, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 25, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 25, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 25, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 19, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance