Drawing for IRECYCLE PACKAGING

USPTO serial 85871288

IRECYCLE PACKAGING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IRECYCLE PACKAGING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Audrey J. Babcock

Audrey J. Babcock Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP80 South 8th Street2200 IDS CenterMinneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Preformed packaging materials made from recycled polymersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2020EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 27, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance