USPTO serial 85872307
MOLDING A BETTER FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOLDING A BETTER FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Barrie, Ontario, CA
Barrie, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ludomir A. Budzyn
LUDOMIR A. BUDZYN HOFFMANN & BARON, LLP6900 JERICHO TPKESYOSSET, NY 11791-4499UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Central vacuum systems, namely, central vacuum cleaners, central vacuum power units, fittings, and valves for central vacuums, pipe for central vacuum systems, and attachments for central vacuums, namely, nozzles, brushes, hoses, wands, vacuum power heads, extension tubes, and crevice tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Plumbing components, namely, grease interceptors, solids interceptors, drains; plumbing waste vent and sewer fittings, namely, traps, elbows, tees, wyes, couplings, cleanouts, bushings, expansion joints, closet flanges, urinal flanges, and caps; plumbing fittings, namely, backwater valves, drains, namely, shower drains, utility drains, floor sinks, bell trap drains, roof drains and commercial floor drains, tub wastes, tub overflows, and continuous waste outlets; water management products, namely, water filtering devices, water purification installations, namely, electric water pumps, water level sensors, solenoid valves, electronic controllers for grey water management equipment, dye dispenser systems for grey water management equipment, water dyeing agents for use in dye dispensers for grey water management equipment, water chlorinators, water aerators, and water hammer arrestors, and related structural fittings and accessories | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metal building ventilation products, namely, roof vents, soffit vents, gable vents, and vent pipe flashings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Canplas Industries Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Canplas Industries Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named MOLDING A BETTER FUTURE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |