USPTO serial 85872681
KFC11
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KFC11?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Louisville, KY
Louisville, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leanne Stendell
LEANNE STENDELL YUM BRANDS INCLEGAL TRADEMARKS7100 CORPORATE DRPLANO, TX 75024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Chicken; vegetable salads; salads containing meat; coleslaw; cooked potatoes | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Sandwiches; wraps; flatbreads; prepared rice dishes; gravy; pasta; dipping sauces; cookies; pastries | ABANDONED | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |