USPTO serial 85872811
COLOR CT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLOR CT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHUNG CHENG DIST., TAIPEI CITY 10062, TW
CHUNG CHENG DIST., TAIPEI CITY 10062, TW
STAR GENERATION LIMITED TAIWAN BRANCH
TAIPEI CITY 10569, TW
Other trademarks owned by STAR GENERATION LIMITED TAIWAN BRANCH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
MORTON J. ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CENTER DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043-4178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | DENTAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LIFTING THE SINUS MEMBRANE AND APPLYING BONE POWDER; ADJUSTABLE DOUBLE BLADE-HANDLED KNIFE FOR USE WITH CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFTS; DENTAL EXPLANT KITS COMPRISING TREPHINES HAVING A PLURALITY OF BLADES OF DIFFERENT SIZES FOR REMOVING IMPLANTS, DENTAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, ORAL IRRIGATORS, HAND TOOLS FOR DRILLING BONE, HAND TOOLS FOR SEPARATING THE SINUS MEMBRANE FROM THE MAXILLARY BONE, AND HAND TOOLS FOR PACKING BONE; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, GUIDING SYSTEMS COMPRISING BLADES, PINS AND A BLADE HANDLE TO BE USED WHEN PLACING IMPLANTS; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, GUIDING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF DENTAL HAND PIECE, DRILL, DIRECTION INDICATION LASER GUIDER TO BE USED TO ENSURE CORRECT IMPLANT LOCATION OF SURGICAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY,GUIDING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF DENTAL HAND PIECE, DRILL, DIRECTION INDICATION LASER GUIDER TO DETERMINE OPTICAL IMPLANT DIAMETER DURING PLACEMENT OF SURGICAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL HAND PIECES, NAMELY, DENTAL BURRS, DENTAL ULTRASONIC HAND PIECES, OPTICAL SCANNING APPLIANCES FOR MEDICAL AND DENTAL USE; SPRAYERS FOR CLEANING GUMS AND TEETH USED IN DENTISTS' OFFICES DURING DENTAL PROCEDURES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ARTIFICIAL TEETH; DENTURES; DENTAL IMPLANT STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS; DENTAL CROWNS; DENTAL BRIDGES; BRACES FOR TEETH | ACTIVE | Nov 21, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HUANG, SHENG-CHIH
- Other trademarks owned by HUANG, SHENG-CHIH
- Other trademarks owned by STAR GENERATION LIMITED TAIWAN BRANCH
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named COLOR CT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |