Drawing for ENGAGE PI2

USPTO serial 85873044

ENGAGE PI2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENGAGE PI2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICIA L WERNER

PATRICIA L WERNER BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-0101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cellular, wireless, and mobility communication monitoring and management apparatus comprised of computer software and hardware for the purpose of identifying, intercepting, controlling, and locating wireless phones and handheld devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 26, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 24, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 30, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 26, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 26, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance