USPTO serial 85873121
LEAN MACHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEAN MACHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANDRA A. WRIGHT
SANDRA A. WRIGHT INFUSE WORKS INC.4280 Bayview Street#308RICHMOND, BC, V7E0B3Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Brewed alcoholic beverages, namely, beers and flavored beers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 30, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | ISER | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |