USPTO serial 85874887
O OPENSTACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5200129Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2017
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with O OPENSTACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Price
Andrew D. Price VENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud environments featuring code comprising a single operating system for cloud computing and the ability to run cloud computing software; software for Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud environments featuring code comprising a single operating system for cloud storage and the ability to run cloud storage software; software for Infrastructureas-a-Service (IaaS) cloud environments featuring code comprising a single operating system for cloud computing and the ability to integrate with cloud computing software; software for Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud environments featuring code comprising a single operating system for cloud storage and the ability to integrate with cloud storage software; computer hardware for Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud environments featuring code comprising a single operating system for cloud computing and the ability to run cloud computing software; computer hardware for Infrastructure-as-a-Service(IaaS) cloud environments featuring code comprising a single operating systemfor cloud storage and the ability to run cloud storage software; computer hardware integrated with software for Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud environments and featuring code comprising a single operating system for cloud computing and the ability to run cloud computing software; computer hardware integrated with software for Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud environments and featuring code comprising a single operating system for cloud computing and the ability to run cloud storage software; none of the foregoing software or hardware for use with Platform as a Service (PaaS) or Software as a Service (SaaS) cloud environments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Training services in the field of deploying Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud computing environments; training services in the field of deploying Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud storage environments; none of the foregoing services for use with Platform as a Service (PaaS) or Software as a Service (SaaS) cloud environments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of deploying Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud computing environments; consulting services in the field of deploying Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud storage environments; none of the foregoing services for use with Platform as a Service (PaaS) or Software as a Service (SaaS) cloud environments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OpenStack Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by OpenStack Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by OpenStack Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named O OPENSTACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 9, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2015 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |