USPTO serial 85876170
À LA CUISINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with À LA CUISINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Gallagher
PATRICK J GALLAGHER NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLPRBC PLAZA60 SOUTH SIXTH STREET SUITE 3100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Marinated and non-marinated meat ready for retail, namely, beef, pork, chicken, veal and lamb; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, vegetables, rice, pasta and sauces; prepared food kits composed of meat, vegetables, rice, pasta and also including sauces or seasonings, ready for cooking and assembly as a meal; pre-cooked and ready to cook hors d'oeuvres stuffed with meat, poultry, vegetables and/or seafood | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 26, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2013 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |