USPTO serial 85878020
OXOBAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OXOBAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Cat box liners in the form of plastic bags; Food bag tape for freezer use; Freezer bags; Garbage bags of plastic; Garbage bags of plastics; General purpose plastic bags; Grocery bags; Lawn and leaf disposal bags; Lawn and leaf disposal system comprising a bag, a bag support, and a handle for attaching to the bag, sold as a kit; Leaf disposal bags; Lunch bags; Merchandise bags; Plastic bags for disposable diapers; Plastic bags for disposing of pet waste; Plastic bags for packaging; Plastic bags for packaging ice; Plastic bags for packing; Plastic bags in the shape of tubes for the disposal of pet-waste; Plastic bags in the shape of tubes for the storage and disposal of waste, including sanitary waste such as diapers and nappies, feminine hygiene products and incontinence products; Plastic disposable diaper bags; Plastic food storage bags for household use; Plastic garbage bags; Plastic sandwich bags; Plastic shopping bags; Plastic trash bags; Rubbish bags (made of paper or plastic materials); Sandwich bags; Trash bags; Trash can liners | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |