USPTO serial 85878822
REWARDS AS A SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REWARDS AS A SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chase Libbey
9519 MT VERNON LNDGALEXANDRIA, VA 22309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing an online non-downloadable Internet-based system application featuring technology enabling users of an application programming interface to integrate a rewards program into a user's information technology systems, namely, account creation, account funding, catalog management, rewards delivery, and order management and history | ACTIVE | Jan 7, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |