Drawing for VALVCHEQ

USPTO serial 85878873

VALVCHEQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALVCHEQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marta S. Levine

Marta S. Levine Quarles & Brady LLP411 East Wisconsin AvenueAttention: IP DocketMilwaukee, WI 53202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Plumbing fittings, namely, backflow prevention valves made of metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 7, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 1, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2013MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance