Drawing for THE TYRANNY IDENTIFIER

USPTO serial 85879199

THE TYRANNY IDENTIFIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE TYRANNY IDENTIFIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Z. Cohen

JONATHAN Z. COHEN JONATHAN Z. COHEN LTD.175 STRAFFORD AVE STE 1PMB 212WAYNE, PA 19087

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business advisory services in the field of multiplied growth strategy and execution; business advisory services, consultancy and informationACTIVEApr 22, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 10, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 12, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2015CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 31, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 12, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 22, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 22, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 22, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 27, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 18, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 25, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance