USPTO serial 85880847
GLOBALGIG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOBALGIG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence J. McAllister
TERRENCE J MCALLISTER OHLANDT GREELEY RUGGIERO & PERLE LLP1 LANDMARK SQ FL 10STAMFORD, CT 06901-2682UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication apparatus, equipment and instruments, namely, electrical transformers, microphones, switches, towers, cables, exchangers, base stations, receivers, transmitters, antennas, modems and routers; mobile telephones; wireless communication and telecommunication apparatus, equipment and instruments, namely, routers, telephones, cellular phone headsets, computer mice; encoded cards, namely a removable computer component used for data input, data output, data storage, data transformation, data transfer, identification, authentication and application processing in relation to telecommunication and mobile computing; data cards, namely a removable computer component used for data input, data output, data storage, data transformation, data transfer, identification, authentication and application processing in relation to telecommunication and mobile computing; electronic memory cards; phone cards, namely, magnetically encoded prepaid telephone calling cards; subscriber identification module (SIM) cards; data processing equipment, namely, data processors and computers; computer hardware and software for use in relation to telecommunication and electronic communication for the purpose of delivering multi-national telephone and data services; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods, namely, cables, batteries, plugs, battery chargers, covers adapted for telephones and computer hardware, including tablet computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, cellular telephone services and the provision of connectivity to a telecommunication network and mobile broadband service to make and receive voice calls, send and receive electronic mail, send and receive short message service (SMS) and access the Internet in locations either within or outside the geographical coverage of the user's home telecommunication network; electronic communication services, namely , providing voice communication, electronic mail and short message service (SMS ) services; electronic and telecommunication transmission services, namely, electronic and digital transmission of voice and data; wireless communication and telecommunication services, namely, wireless broadband communication and telecommunication services; communication of data by means of telecommunications, namely, data communication by electronic mail, short message service (SMS) and data transfer via the Internet; telecommunication services relating to the internet, namely, providing voice communication, electronic mail, short message service (SMS ) and transmission of data services via the Internet; voicemail services; roaming services for telecommunications, namely, provision of connectivity to a telecommunication network to make and receive voice calls, send and receive electronic mail, send and receive short message service (SMS) and access the Internet in a location that is outside the geographical coverage of the user's home network; cellular telephone communication services; provision of communications between computers, namely, communication between computers via broadband, optical or wireless computer networks; transmission of data, documents, messages, images, sounds, voices, text, audio, video by electronic, computer, cable, radio, communications satellite, microwave link, cable, wireless or wired system, namely, via wire or cable connection, communications means; leasing of telecommunication equipment; providing access to telecommunication networks; routing and connecting services for telecommunications, namely, telecommunication routing and junction services; telecommunication network services, namely, the provision of wireless communications links to enable telecommunication between terminals; telecommunications gateway services; transfer of telephone or telecommunications calls; telecommunications services over the Internet, namely, services provided using voice over Internet protocol (VOIP); information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |