Drawing for BAYMED

USPTO serial 85881072

BAYMED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAYMED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Kirke

JOHN KIRKE DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP1999 HARRISON ST FL 25Oakland, CA 94612-3520UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic personal emergency response system consisting of a device worn on the body with a button that users push to notify others in the event of an emergency, and a remote unit that dials out on the telephone for help; Fire alarms; Safety sensors, namely, carbon monoxide detectors, smoke detectors, and combination carbon monoxide and smoke detectors; Smoke alarmsACTIVE—
010Health monitors comprising sensor that monitor the health of the elderly or disabled in their own homesACTIVE—
044Emergency medical assistance; Emergency medical response services; Medical assistance services provided via telecommunication and global computer networks for individuals with health problems through the use of wearable medical devices with automated alert and monitoring capacity; Medical diagnostic testing, monitoring and reporting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 31, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 29, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 5, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 4, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 4, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 4, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 1, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 25, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance