Drawing for KERING

USPTO serial 85882008

KERING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, REGINA C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KERING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyewear, namely, sunglasses, eyeglasses and ophthalmic frames and cases therefor; Leather protective covers specially adapted for personal electronic devices, namely, smartphones, laptop computers and handheld devices; Lenses for sunglasses; Nose guards which can be worn by attachment to eyewear such as sunglasses and ski goggles; Protective cases for smartphones; Protective covers and cases for tablet computers; Protective eyewearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 31, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 4, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 18, 2015PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Mar 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 14, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 13, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 13, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 29, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance