USPTO serial 85882013
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Peter Port, GB
St. Peter Port, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Tally Eitan
A TALLY EITAN EITAN MEHULAL & SADOT18106 KITCHEN HOUSE CTGERMANTOWN, MD 20874-2422UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer hardware; computer software for conducting online courses and seminars in the field of educational software; computer programs and software for creating, production, editing and transmission of videos, all for children's and adults' education; computer game software, interactive multimedia computer game software, all for children's and adults' education | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Multimedia entertainment software production services; educational software production services; education services in the nature of classes, courses, seminars, workshops, conferences, online classes and online courses, at the kindergarten, preschool, elementary, junior high school, high school, and college levels, in and out of a classroom; training services in the field of educational instruction, namely, training educational instructors on the use of multimedia tools and educational software | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |