USPTO serial 85882329
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Grand Cayman, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Braverman, Esq.
TODD BRAVERMAN, ESQ. PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER BARATZ LLP1500 BROADWAY FL 12NEW YORK, NY 10036-4068UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the secure transmission of messages, data, email, text messaging, audio, video and images; computer software for instant messaging; computer software to enable video and voice telephony and communications; computer software to enable secure video and voice telephony and communications; computer software for making conference calls via mobile telephone, fixed telephone, internet and computer networks; computer software for data storage | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, the secure transmission of messages, data, email, text messaging, audio, video, images, voice and audio-visual content between users via a communications network; secured telecommunication services, namely, the secure transmission of messages, data, email, text messaging, audio, video, images, voice and audio-visual content between users via a communications network; mobile and fixed telecommunication services, namely, mobile radio communication, mobile telephone services, fixed and mobile telephone services; video telecommunication services, namely, transmission of video by means of broadband, power line or wireless networks; internet and computer communication services, namely, the secure transmission of messages, data, email, text messaging, audio, video, images, voice and audio-visual content between users via a communications network; providing voice over internet protocol (voip) communication services; mobile and fixed telecommunications network services, namely, communication via fiber-optic networks and providing access to a telecommunication network; internet access services; data communication services, namely, data communication by electronic mail, instant messaging, electronic transmission of facsimile communications and data featuring encryption and decryption; data transmission services, namely, the secure transmission of messages, data, email, text messaging, audio, video, images, voice and audio-visual content between users via a communications network; transmission of email, text messaging, audio, video and images via a communications network; instant messaging services; mobile and fixed telephone conferencing services; video conferencing services; conferencing services provided via a computer network; web conferencing services; providing electronic telecommunications connections, namely, pairing and streaming of voice, video and audio-visual content between users via a communications network; information and advisory services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Scheduling of television, cable, webcast and podcast programs containing voice, video and audio-visual content between users via a communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Hosting and managing of voice, video and audio-visual content on the internet between users via a communications network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |