USPTO serial 85882616
YA YAHEBA BIOGANAL ARG100 MY SKIN AND I
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YA YAHEBA BIOGANAL ARG100 MY SKIN AND I?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dollard-des-Ormeaux,QC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caroline Guy
CAROLINE GUY GUY & MUZZO INC.6455 Christophe-Colomb avenueSuite 206MONTREAL, QUEBEC, H2S 2G5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body milk; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetics; Eye cream; Facial cream; Hair creams; Hair pomades; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Lip balm; Moisturizing creams; Night cream; Non-medicated foot cream; Oils for cosmetic purposes; Skin cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |