USPTO serial 85883166
PATIENTSTORMTRACKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATIENTSTORMTRACKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura T. Geyer
Laura T. Geyer Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPP.O. Box 2255IPLaw@VorysColumbus, OH 43216-2255Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for monitoring health and physiological states of people and for use in making diagnostic, treatment, medical, and health care recommendations; software for monitoring and predicting illnesses integrated with patient's electronic health records; medical imaging software that records, monitors, analyzes, and displays data and dynamic renderings of data images; said goods not for optimizing the administrative flow of patients, staff, work, services, and assets in hospitals and healthcare facilities other than providing indications to transfer patients to higher or lower acuity locations based on analysis of clinical datasets | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research for medical purposes in the field of medical diagnostics, medical treatment assessment tools, and quality assessment indicators; scientific research and development of medical diagnostic testing, medical treatment assessment tools, and quality indicators; online non-downloadable software for monitoring health and physiological states of people and for use in making diagnostic, treatment, medical, and health care recommendations; online software for monitoring and predicting illnesses integrated with patient's electronic health records; online non-downloadable medical imaging software that records, monitors and, analyzes, and displays data and dynamic renderings of data images; said services not for optimizing the administrative flow of patients, staff, work, services, and assets in hospitals and healthcare facilities other than providing indications to transfer patients to higher or lower acuity locations based on analysis of clinical datasets | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Consulting services in the field of medical diagnostics, medical treatment efficacy and complications, and quality assessment; medical diagnostic testing, monitoring, analysis, and reporting; healthcare services, namely, medical diagnostics; consulting services in the field of assessment of quality medical services and health care diagnostic services; said services not for optimizing the administrative flow of patients, staff, work, services, and assets in hospitals and healthcare facilities other than providing indications to transfer patients to higher or lower acuity locations based on analysis of clinical datasets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lawrence Lynn
- Other trademarks owned by Lawrence Lynn
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named PATIENTSTORMTRACKER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 26, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |