Drawing for CLS360

USPTO serial 85883499

CLS360

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARER, ZACHARY R
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLS360?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JungJin Lee

JUNGJIN LEE LEE LEE & ASSOCIATES PCPO BOX 512ANN ARBOR, MI 48106-0512UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042(Based on 44(e)) (Based on Use in Commerce) Computer software development in the field of oil and gas industry information managementACTIVEFeb 26, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 17, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 17, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 2, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 3, 2015RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jan 30, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 2, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 11, 2014GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Aug 11, 2014GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Aug 11, 2014CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 8, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 8, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 11, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 11, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 28, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 30, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance