Drawing for HEALTHY FOOD, YUMMY TASTE

USPTO serial 85883721

HEALTHY FOOD, YUMMY TASTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY FOOD, YUMMY TASTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet C. Moreira (Gamble)

Janet C. Moreira (Gamble) MAVEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY333 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 2000Miami, FL 33131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Flavored milk, condensed milk, evaporated milk, milk, milk-based beverages containing fruit; cheese, cream cheese, cottage cheese, butter, butter substitutes, margarine, whipping cream, sour cream, yogurts, yogurt-based beverages; Processed meat, namely, ham and turkeyACTIVE—
030Ice milk; Frozen yogurt; PuddingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 26, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 29, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance