USPTO serial 85884235
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alina S. Morris
ALINA S. MORRIS Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness PLLC1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | bags adapted for laptops; computer bags; bags adapted for holding tablet computers, portable phones, cell phones, smart phones, and portable media players; protective sleeves for laptop computers, tablet computers, portable phones, cell phones, smart phones, and portable media players; carrying cases for laptop computers, portable phones, cell phones, smart phones, and portable media players; eyeglasses; computer stands specially designed for holding a computer, printer and accessories | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | leashes for animals; collars for animals; pet accessories, namely, canvas, vinyl and leather pouches for holding and dispensing disposable bags for waste; leather key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of bags, wallets, and carrying cases; Custom manufacture of bags, wallets, and carrying cases using recycled materials; Recycling; Recycling of used materials in the nature of bicycle tires, bicycle tubes, and advertising banners; Recycling services featuring a reuse program for upcycling and reuse; Providing a website featuring information on recycling and recycling in the nature of upcycling of packaging and consumer product waste | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |