Drawing for MARIO BETTER FOR YOU SNACKS

USPTO serial 85885650

MARIO BETTER FOR YOU SNACKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIORELLI, JOANNA ELISA-HOLGUI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARIO BETTER FOR YOU SNACKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff

LAUREL V. DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game, not live; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs; milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats; fruit chips; potato chips; olive chips, namely chips made primarily of processed olives and corn flourACTIVE—
030Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; rice; tapioca and sago; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal based snack foods, bread, biscuits; bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, pastilles, gum paste, yogurt-covered fruit; sugar, honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt; mustard; condiments, namely, vinegar and sauces; spices; ice; rice based snack foods, namely, rice cakes and chips and snacks on the basis of rice flourACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 8, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 16, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 2, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 26, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 25, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance