Drawing for QSB INSIGHT

USPTO serial 85885953

QSB INSIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with QSB INSIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael R. Friscia

MICHAEL R. FRISCIA MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP4 GATEWAY CTR100 MULBERRY STNEWARK, NJ 07102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016webinars, white papers and video in the field of businessACTIVE—
041educational services in the field of business, namely, providing webinars, white papers and videoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 28, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 28, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 14, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 21, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 21, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 2, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance