USPTO serial 85886016
MOBILEMD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOBILEMD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maren C. Perry
MAREN C PERRY KING & SPALDING LLP1185 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile device software for use by companies providing mobile device wireless carrier services to provide product support and updates for mobile device operating systems and features; mobile device software for use by companies providing mobile device wireless carrier services for monitoring, diagnosing, and fixing mobile device problems; mobile device software for use by companies providing mobile device wireless carrier services to facilitate real-time connection and communication with customer support representatives for the diagnosis and repair of mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a Service (SaaS) for use by mobile device operators, manufacturers, and independent services providers to deliver product support and updates for mobile device operating systems and features; Software as a Service (SaaS) for use by mobile device operators, device manufacturers, and independent operators to remotely monitor, diagnose, and correct mobile device problems; Software as a Service (SaaS) for use by mobile device operators, device manufacturers, and independent service providers to remotely monitor, diagnose and fix mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by InnoPath Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by InnoPath Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MOBILEMD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |