Drawing for DO DAT

USPTO serial 85886183

DO DAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKER, JUSTINE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DO DAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine Dugan O'Connor

CATHERINE DUGAN O'CONNOR DAY PITNEY LLP1 INTERNATIONAL PLBOSTON, MA 02110-3179UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in organizational task and workflow management, coordination, tracking and follow up; enterprise resource planning software; computer software for use in managing business functionsACTIVE—
035Business management consulting; business project management; business consulting services in the field of organizational task and workflow management, coordination, tracking and follow up; business consulting services in the field of enterprise resource planning; business information services in the field of business process management, business strategic management and planning, and business technology; business management planning and assistance; preparing business reports; providing information in the field of business managementACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer software and technology solutions for organizational task and workflow management, coordination, tracking and follow up; Design and development of computer software for enterprise resource planning; installation, implementation, maintenance and repair services with respect to computer software; providing technical consultation in the field of computer information systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 16, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 16, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 8, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance