Drawing for RESORTS WORLD BIMINI BAHAMAS

USPTO serial 85886249

RESORTS WORLD BIMINI BAHAMAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPP, HEATHER
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESORTS WORLD BIMINI BAHAMAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Suzanne M. Hengl

SUZANNE M. HENGL BAKER BOTTS, L.L.P.30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 4340NEW YORK, NY 10112-4498UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035operating retail outlets featuring clothing, electronics, luxury goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 22, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 25, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 23, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 23, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 8, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 5, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 25, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 23, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 23, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 23, 2013PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Jul 17, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance