USPTO serial 85886546
OPENERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPENERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Noblitt
DANIEL J. NOBLITT THE NOBLITT GROUP, PLLC8800 N GAINEY CENTER DR STE 279SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258-2123UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for online management of personal and business content in the field of cloud computing services; computer software, namely, downloadable programs and mobile device software for the collecting, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage, and sharing of data and information; computer software for cloud content management; computer software for providing access to, providing information to, and obtaining information from computer networks for cloud content management; computer software for synchronizing local computer files, folders, data and information with a cloud storage platform; computer software for synchronizing computer files, folders, data and information within a collaborative work environment; computer software for use in data storage and file synchronization | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 2012 |
| 042 | Electronic storage of remote computer data; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the collecting, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage, and sharing of data and information; application service provider of cloud computing services, namely, hosting web based applications for cloud content management of business content; computer services for synchronizing local computer files, folders, data and information with a cloud storage platform; computer services for synchronizing computer files, folders, data and information within a collaborative work environment; cloud computing featuring software as a service for use in data storage and file synchronization; Cloud computing featuring software that provides virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Cloud computing featuring software that allows for remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |