USPTO serial 85886905
GOOD START
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOOD START?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perla M. Kuhn
PERLA M. KUHN Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Building 3Princeton Pike Corporate CenterLawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk; milk based beverages containing fruit juice, fruits, soy, or cereals; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; soy, almond and rice milk beverages; eggs; prepared nuts; nut and seed-based spreads; nut butters; jellies; jams; compotes; edible oils and fats; dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; fruit-based snack food; meat-based snack foods; nut-based snack foods; potato-based snack foods; soy-based snack foods; vegetable-based snack foods; cooked, dried, frozen or preserved fruits and vegetables; frozen, prepared or packaged meals consisting primarily of vegetables or meat, fish or poultry substitutes; snack mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, and also including dried fruits, seeds, dried milk, yogurt, and rice or soy based dairy substitutes; soups; preparations for making soups; meat; processed fish; poultry; game; meat extracts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Processed and breakfast cereals; cereal based snack food; high-protein cereal bars; ready-to-eat cereals; processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; grain-based food beverages; bread; pastries; biscuits; cookies; crackers; rice cakes; edible ices; frozen confectionery; fruit jelly candy; cereal based energy bars, not for use as a meal replacement; multigrain-based snack foods; cereal based snack food; rice-based snack foods; ice cream; frozen yogurt; custard; ice; sauces; mustard; seasonings; spices; food flavorings; flavorings for beverages; coffee; artificial coffee; tea; cocoa; sugar; honey, treacle; golden syrup; yeast; baking powder; fruit sauces; preserved garden herbs as seasonings | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes; non-alcoholic rice-based beverages not being milk substitutes; oat-based beverages with milk not for food purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Australasian Conference Association Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named GOOD START
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |