USPTO serial 85887334
GENTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sander R. Gelsing
SANDER R. GELSING WARREN SINCLAIR LLP600, 4911 - 51 STREETRED DEER, ALBERTA, T4N6V4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | wholesale and retail store services featuring hot oil heaters, trailer mounted heaters, direct diesel fired heaters and heating units; wholesale and retail store services featuring steam generators, oil-fired steamers, direct diesel fired steamers and trailer mounted steamers; wholesale and retail store services featuring pumping equipment, namely, pressure trucks and pump trucks; wholesale and retail store services featuring oilfield equipment, namely, heaters, steamers and pumps; wholesale and retail store services featuring oilfield equipment, namely, refurbished drilling rigs, seismic drilling rigs, mud tanks, bed trucks, trailers and pump skid shacks; wholesale and retail store services featuring replacement parts for oilfield equipment; retail services through direct solicitation by salespersons directed to end-users featuring hot oil heaters, trailer mounted heaters, direct diesel fired heaters and heating units; retail services through direct solicitation by salespersons directed to end-users featuring steam generators, oil-fired steamers, direct diesel fired steamers and trailer mounted steamers; retail services through direct solicitation by salespersons directed to end-users featuring pumping equipment, namely, pressure trucks and pump trucks; retail services through direct solicitation by salespersons directed to end-users featuring oilfield equipment, namely, heaters, steamers and pumps; retail services through direct solicitation by salespersons directed to end-users featuring oilfield equipment, namely, refurbished drilling rigs, seismic drilling rigs, mud tanks, bed trucks, trailers and pump skid shacks; retail services through direct solicitation by salespersons directed to end-users featuring replacement parts for oilfield equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |