Drawing for APT LIFE CHANGING INNOVATIVE INDIVIDUAL CARE AMERICAN PAIN TREATMENT

USPTO serial 85887605

APT LIFE CHANGING INNOVATIVE INDIVIDUAL CARE AMERICAN PAIN TREATMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APT LIFE CHANGING INNOVATIVE INDIVIDUAL CARE AMERICAN PAIN TREATMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie E. Reitz

JULIE E. REITZ HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN LLP39400 WOODWARD AVE STE 101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Medical pain clinics; rehabilitation patient care servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 9, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 3, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2013CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2013GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance