Drawing for RXCONNECT

USPTO serial 85887864

RXCONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RXCONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Pickerill

JOHN PICKERILL FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.200 S 6TH ST STE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for generating prescription forms, transmitting prescriptions and filing prescriptions for dental products between dental professionals and dental laboratoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 22, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 22, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance