USPTO serial 85889943
SENSORYWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENSORYWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dania Beach, FL
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
Joseph V. Myers III Seyfarth Shaw LLP1075 Peachtree St. NE, Suite 2500Atlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wearable computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing information relating to movies, television shows, music, magazines, books, audiobooks, and games; entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, magazines, brochures, pamphlets, newspapers, articles, manuals, newsletters, journals, workbooks, periodicals, and catalogs in the field of entertainment; entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring non-downloadable series of fiction books and series of fiction audiobooks; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line non-downloadable general feature magazines; entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring non-downloadable musical performances and musical videos; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; entertainment services, namely, providing news and information in the field of entertainment relating to movies, television shows, music, magazines, books, audiobooks, entertainment based computer applications, games, entertainment based cloud computing, and entertainment information on the Internet; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of fiction and non-fiction books and movies, television shows, music, magazines, audiobooks, and games; entertainment services, namely, rental of electronic books, films, movies, and pre-recorded videos that may be downloaded from a global computer network; entertainment services, namely, providing online non-downloadable comic books and graphic novels | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, database design and development; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for transmitting, sharing, receiving, downloading, displaying, interacting with and transferring content, text, visual works, audio works, audiovisual works, literary works, data, files, documents and electronic works, all in in the field of entertainment; computer services, namely, computer aided graphic design; computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, and maintaining web sites in the field of personal productivity; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for business, namely, software for connecting doctors with medical patients and providing medical information to doctors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Magic Leap, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Magic Leap, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SENSORYWARE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |